Fee Distribution

Overview

The PoA module implements a custom fee distribution mechanism based on validator power. Unlike the standard Cosmos SDK x/distribution module, PoA uses a checkpoint-based system to allocate fees proportionally to validators without automatic distribution.

How Fees Accumulate

Fees flow through the PoA system differently than standard Cosmos SDK:

Block Fees: Transaction fees collected in each block go to the fee_collector module account by default, or to the PoA module account if configured (see Fee Routing Setup)
Checkpoint System: Allocated fees are updated for validators when:
- Any validator power changes
- Any validator withdraws fees

Why Checkpointing?: Ensures fair distribution when power changes. If power changes mid-period, fees are allocated based on old power distribution before the change takes effect. Location: x/poa/keeper/distribution.go:18

Distribution Algorithm

Checkpoint-Based Allocation

The PoA module uses a checkpoint system to allocate fees fairly when validator power changes. Rather than distributing fees actively at every block, allocation efficiently happens at discrete checkpoints. Checkpoint Triggers:

Any validator power change (via MsgUpdateValidators)
Any fee withdrawal (via MsgWithdrawFees)

Unallocated Fees Calculation: At checkpoint time

t

, calculate unallocated fees:

U_t = B_{collector}(t) - A_{total}(t)

Where:

$U_t$ = unallocated fees at checkpoint $t$
$B_{collector}(t)$ = current balance in the PoA module account
$A_{total}(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} F_i(t)$ = sum of all previously- allocated fees across all validators (0 if no checkpoints have been done)

Proportional Share Allocation: For each active validator

i

(where

P_i(t) > 0

), allocate a share proportional to their power:

S_i(t) = U_t \times \frac{P_i(t)}{P_{total}(t)}

Where:

$S_i(t)$ = share allocated to validator $i$ at checkpoint $t$
$P_i(t)$ = voting power of validator $i$ at checkpoint $t$
$P_{total}(t) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} P_j(t)$ = sum of all validator powers

Accumulated Fees Update: After allocation, update each validator’s accumulated fees:

F_i(t+1) = F_i(t) + S_i(t)

Where:

$F_i(t)$ = validator $i$ ‘s accumulated fees before checkpoint
$F_i(t+1)$ = validator $i$ ‘s accumulated fees after checkpoint
$S_i(t)$ = share allocated in this checkpoint

Total Allocated Tracking: Update the global allocated tracker:

A_{total}(t+1) = A_{total}(t) + U_t

After this checkpoint,

A_{total}(t+1) = B_{collector}(t)

(all fees are now allocated).

Example Checkpoint Sequence

Initial State (before checkpoint):

PoA module account balance: $B_{collector} = 1000$ tokens
Total allocated: $A_{total} = 400$ tokens (from previous checkpoints)
Validator A: $P_A = 50$ , $F_A = 200$ tokens allocated
Validator B: $P_B = 50$ , $F_B = 200$ tokens allocated
Total power: $P_{total} = 100$

Admin Action: Admin submits MsgUpdateValidators to change power distribution to 30/70 Checkpoint Triggered (before power change takes effect):

Calculate unallocated: $U = 1000 - 400 = 600$ tokens
Allocate shares based on current power (50/50):
- Validator A: $S_A = 600 \times \frac{50}{100} = 300$ tokens
- Validator B: $S_B = 600 \times \frac{50}{100} = 300$ tokens
Update accumulated fees:
- Validator A: $F_A = 200 + 300 = 500$ tokens
- Validator B: $F_B = 200 + 300 = 500$ tokens
Update total allocated: $A_{total} = 400 + 600 = 1000$ tokens

After Checkpoint - Power Change Applied:

Validator A: $P_A = 30$ (new power for future blocks)
Validator B: $P_B = 70$ (new power for future blocks)
All 1000 tokens now allocated ( $A_{total} = B_{collector}$ )
Each validator has updated $F_i$ available for withdrawal

Why This Matters: Validator A earned 300 tokens (50% share) based on their power during the period when those fees were collected. After the checkpoint, their power drops to 30%, so future fees will be split 30/70. Checkpointing ensures validators are rewarded based on the work they actually performed. Precision: Uses DecCoins (decimal coins) to prevent rounding dust accumulation. Each validator tracks fractional amounts that are too small to withdraw.

Withdrawing Fees

MsgWithdrawFees (x/poa/keeper/msg_server.go:91) Any validator operator can withdraw accumulated fees:

Submit Withdrawal: Signed by operator address
Checkpoint: System checkpoints all validators first (allocates any pending fees)
Truncate: Decimal coins truncated to whole coins
Transfer: Coins transferred from the PoA module account to operator address
Update Tracking: Total allocated decreases by withdrawn amount
Remainder: Decimal remainder stays in validator’s allocated balance

Example:

Validator has: 100.7543 utokens allocated
Withdrawal:    100 utokens transferred to operator
Remainder:     0.7543 utokens remain allocated (less than least significant utoken digit)

Location: x/poa/keeper/distribution.go:106

Withdrawal Formula

When validator

i

withdraws fees:

W_i = \lfloor F_i \rfloor

F_i' = F_i - W_i

A_{total}' = A_{total} - W_i

Where:

$W_i$ = amount withdrawn (truncated to integer coins)
$F_i$ = validator’s allocated fees before withdrawal
$F_i'$ = validator’s allocated fees after withdrawal (decimal remainder)
$\lfloor F_i \rfloor$ = floor function (truncate decimals)
$A_{total}'$ = updated total allocated across all validators

Fee Routing Setup

PoA has its own module account for collecting fees. Enabling the PoA module account is recommended to keep fee accounting isolated and accurate. If not enabled, fees are deposited into the standard fee_collector account by default. To enable the PoA module account, two wiring changes are required:

1. Register the PoA Module Account

app.AccountKeeper = authkeeper.NewAccountKeeper(
    appCodec,
    runtime.NewKVStoreService(storeKeys[authtypes.StoreKey]),
    authtypes.ProtoBaseAccount,
    map[string][]string{
        authtypes.FeeCollectorName: nil,
        govtypes.ModuleName:        {authtypes.Burner, authtypes.Staking},
        poatypes.ModuleName:        nil, // register PoA module account
    },
    // ...
)

Source: simapp/app.go

2. Configure the Ante Handler

Use WithFeeRecipientModule on NewDeductFeeDecorator to route fees to the PoA module account:

anteDecorators := []sdk.AnteDecorator{
    ante.NewSetUpContextDecorator(),
    ante.NewExtensionOptionsDecorator(options.ExtensionOptionChecker),
    ante.NewValidateBasicDecorator(),
    ante.NewTxTimeoutHeightDecorator(),
    ante.NewValidateMemoDecorator(options.AccountKeeper),
    ante.NewConsumeGasForTxSizeDecorator(options.AccountKeeper),
    ante.NewDeductFeeDecorator(options.AccountKeeper, options.BankKeeper, options.FeegrantKeeper, options.TxFeeChecker).
        WithFeeRecipientModule(poatypes.ModuleName), // redirect fees to PoA module account
    ante.NewSetPubKeyDecorator(options.AccountKeeper),
    ante.NewValidateSigCountDecorator(options.AccountKeeper),
    ante.NewSigGasConsumeDecorator(options.AccountKeeper, options.SigGasConsumer),
    ante.NewSigVerificationDecorator(options.AccountKeeper, options.SignModeHandler, options.SigVerifyOptions...),
    ante.NewIncrementSequenceDecorator(options.AccountKeeper),
}

Source: simapp/ante.go WithFeeRecipientModule is backwards compatible — omitting it defaults to the standard fee_collector behavior.

Security Considerations

Decimal Precision:
- Uses DecCoins to prevent dust accumulation
- Validators track fractional amounts
- Remainders preserved across withdrawals
- Prevents rounding errors from accumulating

Cosmos Enterprise

​Fee Distribution

​Overview

​How Fees Accumulate

​Distribution Algorithm

​Checkpoint-Based Allocation

​Example Checkpoint Sequence

​Withdrawing Fees

​Withdrawal Formula

​Fee Routing Setup

​1. Register the PoA Module Account

​2. Configure the Ante Handler

​Security Considerations

Fee Distribution

Overview

How Fees Accumulate

Distribution Algorithm

Checkpoint-Based Allocation

Example Checkpoint Sequence

Withdrawing Fees

Withdrawal Formula

Fee Routing Setup

1. Register the PoA Module Account

2. Configure the Ante Handler

Security Considerations